Silicon Valley is winning the race to build the first driverless cars (2024)

Silicon Valley is winning the race to build the first driverless cars (1)

Article

Professor Michael Wade in The Conversation

By Michael R. Wade and Remy Assir

6 min.

February 2018

Henry Ford didn’t invent the motor car. The late 1800s saw a flurry of innovation by hundreds of companies battling to deliver on the promise of fast, efficient and reasonably-priced mechanical transportation. Ford later came to dominate the industry thanks to the development of the moving assembly line.

Today the sector is poised for another breakthrough with the advent of cars that drive themselves. But unlike the original wave of automobile innovation, the race for supremacy in autonomous vehicles is concentrated among a few corporate giants. So who is set to dominate this time?

I’ve analysed six companies we think are leading the race to build the first truly driverless car. Three of these – General Motors, Ford and Volkswagen – come from the existing car industry and need to integrate self-driving technology into their existing fleet of mass-produced vehicles. The other three – Tesla, Uber and Waymo (owned by the same company as Google) – are newcomers from the digital technology world of Silicon Valley and have to build a mass manufacturing capability.

While it’s impossible to know all the developments at any given time, we have tracked investments, strategic partnerships and official press releases to learn more about what’s happening behind the scenes. The car industry typically rates self-driving technology on a scale from Level 0 (no automation) to Level 5 (full automation). We’ve assessed where each company is now and estimated how far they are from reaching the top level. Here’s how we think each player is performing.

Volkswagen

Volkswagen has invested in taxi-hailing app Gett and partnered with chip-maker Nvidia to develop an artificial intelligence co-pilot for its cars. In 2018, the VW Group is set to release the Audi A8, the first production vehicle that reaches Level 3 on the scale, “conditional driving automation”. This means the car’s computer will handle all driving functions but a human has to be ready to take over if necessary.

Ford

Ford already sells cars with a Level 2 autopilot, “partial driving automation”. This means one or more aspects of driving are controlled by a computer based on information about the environment, for example combined cruise control and lane centring. Alongside other investments, the company has put US$1 billion into Argo AI, an artificial intelligence company for self-driving vehicles. Following a trial to test pizza delivery using autonomous vehicles, Ford is now testing Level 4 cars on public roads. These feature “high automation”, where the car can drive entirely on its own but not in certain conditions such as when the road surface is poor or the weather is bad.

General Motors

GM also sells vehicles with Level 2 automation but, after buying Silicon Valley startup Cruise Automation in 2016, now plans to launch the first mass production-ready Level 5 autonomy vehicle that drives completely on its own by 2019. The Cruise AV will have no steering wheel or pedals to allow a human to take over and be part of a large fleet of driverless taxis the company plans to operate in big cities. But crucially the company hasn’t yet secured permission to test the car on public roads.

Waymo (Google)

Founded as a special project in 2009, Waymo separated from Google (though they’re both owned by the same parent firm, Alphabet) in 2016. Though it has never made, sold or operated a car on a commercial basis, Waymo has created test vehicles that have clocked more than 4m miles without human drivers as of November 2017. Waymo tested its Level 5 car, “Firefly”, between 2015 and 2017 but then decided to focus on hardware that could be installed in other manufacturers’ vehicles, starting with the Chrysler Pacifica.

Uber

The taxi-hailing app maker Uber has been testing autonomous cars on the streets of Pittsburgh since 2016, always with an employee behind the wheel ready to take over in case of a malfunction. After buying the self-driving truck company Otto in 2016 for a reported US$680m, Uber is now expanding its AI capabilities and plans to test NVDIA’s latest chips in Otto’s vehicles. It has also partnered with Volvo to create a self-driving fleet of cars, and with Toyota to co-create a ride-sharing autonomous vehicle.

Tesla

The first major car manufacturer to come from Silicon Valley, Tesla was also the first to introduce Level 2 autopilot back in 2015. The following year, it announced that all new Teslas would have the hardware for full autonomy, meaning once the software is finished it can be deployed on existing cars with an instant upgrade. Some experts have challenged this approach, arguing that the company has merely added surround cameras to its production cars that aren’t as capable as the laser-based sensing systems that most other carmakers are using.

But the company has collected data from hundreds of thousands of cars, driving millions of miles across all terrains. So we shouldn’t dismiss the firm’s founder, Elon Musk, when he claims a Level 4 Tesla will drive from LA to New York without any human interference within the first half of 2018.

Winners

At the moment, the disruptors like Tesla, Waymo and Uber seem to have the upper hand. While the traditional automakers are focusing on bringing Level 3 and 4 partial automation to market, the new companies are leapfrogging them by moving more directly towards Level 5 full automation. Waymo may have the least experience of dealing with consumers in this sector but it has already clocked up a huge amount of time testing some of the most advanced technology on public roads.

The incumbent carmakers are also focused on the difficult process of integrating new technology and business models into their existing manufacturing operations by buying up small companies. The challengers, on the other hand, are easily partnering with other big players including manufacturers to get the scale and expertise they need more quickly.

Tesla is building its own manufacturing capability but also collecting vast amounts of critical data that will enable it to more easily upgrade its cars when ready for full automation. In particular, Waymo’s experience, technology capability and ability to secure solid partnerships puts it at the head of the pack.

This article was published in The Conversation.

Contact

for additional information on IMD publications

Related topics

Strategy

Browse all topics

Digital and AI Transformation

Related topics

Strategy

Browse all topics

Discover our latest research

IMD's faculty and research teams publish articles, case studies, books and reports on a wide range of topics

All articles

Keep reading

Case Study

How Boeing lost altitude

The case study examines recent aviation safety concerns at Boeing, focusing on manufacturing issues, leadership decisions and regulatory oversight....

Board Corporate Governance Leadership Strategy

By Goutam Challagalla, Patrick Reinmoeller and Samaja Penumaka

Case reference: IMD-7-2588, © 2024

Read more

Article Ringing the changes: Vodafone ‘insider' makes some tough calls as CEO [Video] Margherita Della Valle tells IMD President Jean-François Manzoni how she is delivering radical change to reenergize Vodafone and paving the way for... Leadership Strategy By Jean-François Manzoni in I by IMD 18 June 2024 Read more

Case Study

UrbanLuxe Cosmetics: Embracing S&OP/IBP

The case is seen through the eyes of the newly appointed supply chain director at a cosmetics company based in Berlin. The general manager has task...

Operations Strategy

By Ralf W. Seifert and Richard Markoff

Case reference: IMD-7-2572, © 2024

Read more

Case Study

Metalshub: A steely approach to launching a B2B metal trading platform

Few Business to Business (B2B) marketplaces have succeeded. Metalshub has successfully combined a software platform as a service, with a marketplac...

Business to Business Digital Disruption Economics Operations Strategy

By Didier Bonnet, Geoffrey G. Parker, Charles E. Hutchinson and Lisa Simone Duke

Case reference: IMD-7-2457, © 2024

Read more

Case Study

Contabilizei: Freeing entrepreneurs from Brazil’s tax complexity

The case focuses on Contabilizei, a Brazilian startup providing online accounting services for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The case ...

Entrepreneurship Business to Business Digital Strategy

By Benoit F. Leleux, Diego Dias, Ariella Pfenninger, Daniel Töller and Thomas Villiger

Case reference: IMD-7-2546, © 2024

Read more

Article Ipsen: Leveraging an encompassing strategy to accelerate growth in pharma IMD's Niccolò Pisani examines how a combination of clear-eyed analysis and a strong sense of purpose allowed the French biopharma to change course. Leadership Strategy Decision Making By Niccolò Pisani in I by IMD 11 June 2024 Read more

Article

Engineer your own luck

Companies that modularize and externalize their best capabilities are in a strong position to seize unexpected opportunities. Prediction is hard. T...

Organizational Change Disruption Strategy Innovation

By Mark J. Greeven, Howard H. Yu and Jialu Shan

in MIT Sloan Management Review

Summer 2024, vol. 65, no. 4

Read more

Article

Silicon Valley is winning the race to build the first driverless cars (4)

Why Chinese companies are betting big on the Euro 24 tournament

Leading Chinese companies are preparing to take advantage of exposure and opportunities as top sponsors and suppliers to the UEFA EURO 2024 Men’s S...

Competitiveness Innovation Strategy China Future Readiness Marketing

By Mark J. Greeven and Howard H. Yu

in I by IMD

5 June 2024

Read more

Article

Silicon Valley is winning the race to build the first driverless cars (5)

Election smoke and mirrors: Assessing Biden's recent tariff moves against China

Now that the dust has settled, what should executives make of President Biden's recent restrictions on certain goods sources from China?

Competitiveness Leadership Strategy China

By Simon J. Evenett

in I by IMD

4 June 2024

Read more

Article How to accelerate strategic capabilities Andie, an operations director, overcomes team silos and funding uncertainties by shifting from control to open communication and collaboration with... Coaching Strategy By Ioana Parry in I by IMD 24 May 2024 Read more

How Boeing lost altitude

By Goutam ChallagallaPatrick ReinmoellerandSamaja Penumaka
Case reference:IMD-7-2588©2024

Summary

The case study examines recent aviation safety concerns at Boeing, focusing on manufacturing issues, leadership decisions and regulatory oversight. It traces Boeing’s trajectory since the McDonnell Douglas merger in 1997, highlighting the changes in the engineering culture and outsourcing strategy that affected the production quality of the 787 Dreamliner and the 737 MAX aircraft. The case also explores how leadership decisions prioritized cost-cutting over quality, leading to inconsistencies and delays. Then the case discusses the 737 MAX, which was grounded after two major crashes in 2018 and 2019. Investigations by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the Department of Justice and a Senate Committee found defects in the MCAS flight control system and flaws in the safety certification. The case study explores the leadership actions of CEOs McNerney, Muilenburg and Calhoun, who decisively shaped the nature of the company.

Reference IMD-7-2588

Copyright ©2024

Copyright owner IMD Copyright

Organization Boeing

Industry Travel and Leisure, Airlines and Aviation

Available Languages English

Contact

for additional information on IMD publications

Related topics

Board

Corporate Governance

Leadership

Strategy

Browse all topics

Ringing the changes: Vodafone ‘insider' makes some tough calls as CEO [Video]

By Jean-François Manzoni
inI by IMD18 June 2024

Summary

Margherita Della Valle tells IMD President Jean-François Manzoni how she is delivering radical change to reenergize Vodafone and paving the way for...

Read more

Contact

for additional information on IMD publications

Related topics

Strategy

Browse all topics

UrbanLuxe Cosmetics: Embracing S&OP/IBP

By Ralf W. SeifertandRichard Markoff
Case reference:IMD-7-2572©2024

Summary

The case is seen through the eyes of the newly appointed supply chain director at a cosmetics company based in Berlin. The general manager has tasked the new supply chain director to provide bold process recommendations to improve the poor service, high inventory and rampant use of overtime. To understand the issues at play, the supply chain director meets with the CFO, the factory manager, the chief procurement officer and chief revenue officer and their feedback constitutes the body of the case. Each individual offers a different perspective, though none take any responsibility. The CFO is unhappy with the high inventory levels. The factory manager feels helpless in the situation. The chief procurement officer is proud of the savings he has generated by shifting to Asia. The chief revenue officer appears altogether disinterested and not concerned by the problem. The supply chain director must integrate this feedback and propose a new process that will address the performance shortcomings, define the roles and responsibilities of each, along with KPIs to monitor progress.

Reference IMD-7-2572

Copyright ©2024

Copyright owner IMD Copyright

Organization UrbanLuxe Cosmetics (Invented name)

Available Languages English

Contact

for additional information on IMD publications

Related topics

Operations

Strategy

Browse all topics

Metalshub: A steely approach to launching a B2B metal trading platform

By Didier BonnetGeoffrey G. ParkerCharles E. HutchinsonandLisa Simone Duke
Case reference:IMD-7-2457©2024

Summary

Few Business to Business (B2B) marketplaces have succeeded. Metalshub has successfully combined a software platform as a service, with a marketplace matching supply and demand for raw materials used in the Metals and Mining industries. Through innovative pricing and business models, the company has managed to scale its operations in a short timeframe.

Reference IMD-7-2457

Copyright ©2024

Copyright owner IMD Copyright

Organization Metalshub

Industry Materials, Metals and Mining

Available Languages English

Contact

for additional information on IMD publications

Related topics

Business to Business

Digital

Disruption

Economics

Operations

Strategy

Browse all topics

Contabilizei: Freeing entrepreneurs from Brazil’s tax complexity

By Benoit F. LeleuxDiego DiasAriella PfenningerDaniel TöllerandThomas Villiger
Case reference:IMD-7-2546©2024

Summary

The case focuses on Contabilizei, a Brazilian startup providing online accounting services for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The case study delves into the challenges faced by the company’s founder and CEO, Vitor Torres, as he navigated Brazil’s complex social and economic landscape. Issues such as Brazil’s byzantine tax system, disparate educational quality and accessibility, and the high cost of doing business in the country are explored. Despite these barriers, Contabilizei demonstrated impressive growth, transforming digital innovation into standardized services. However, the rise of competitors and persistent profitability concerns prompt Torres to thoroughly explore future strategies to maintain market leadership and improve financial performance. The case provides an in-depth analysis of Brazil’s entrepreneurial ecosystem, examining its business, educational, legal and infrastructural realities and their implications for startups as well as the difficult step for startups to become established companies.

Reference IMD-7-2546

Copyright ©2024

Copyright owner IMD Copyright

Organization Contabilizei

Industry Finance and Insurance, Financial Services

Available Languages English

Contact

for additional information on IMD publications

Related topics

Entrepreneurship

Business to Business

Digital

Strategy

Browse all topics

Ipsen: Leveraging an encompassing strategy to accelerate growth in pharma

By Niccolò Pisani
inI by IMD11 June 2024

Summary

IMD's Niccolò Pisani examines how a combination of clear-eyed analysis and a strong sense of purpose allowed the French biopharma to change course.

Read more

Contact

for additional information on IMD publications

Related topics

Leadership

Strategy

Decision Making

Browse all topics

Engineer your own luck

By Mark J. GreevenHoward H. YuandJialu Shan
inMIT Sloan Management ReviewSummer 2024, vol. 65, no. 4

Summary

Companies that modularize and externalize their best capabilities are in a strong position to seize unexpected opportunities. Prediction is hard. T...

Contact

for additional information on IMD publications

Related topics

Organizational Change

Disruption

Strategy

Innovation

Browse all topics

Why Chinese companies are betting big on the Euro 24 tournament

By Mark J. GreevenandHoward H. Yu
inI by IMD5 June 2024

Summary

Leading Chinese companies are preparing to take advantage of exposure and opportunities as top sponsors and suppliers to the UEFA EURO 2024 Men’s S...

Contact

for additional information on IMD publications

Related topics

Competitiveness

Innovation

Strategy

China

Future Readiness

Marketing

Browse all topics

Election smoke and mirrors: Assessing Biden's recent tariff moves against China

By Simon J. Evenett
inI by IMD4 June 2024

Summary

Now that the dust has settled, what should executives make of President Biden's recent restrictions on certain goods sources from China?

Contact

for additional information on IMD publications

Related topics

Competitiveness

Leadership

Strategy

China

Browse all topics

How to accelerate strategic capabilities

By Ioana Parry
inI by IMD24 May 2024

Summary

Andie, an operations director, overcomes team silos and funding uncertainties by shifting from control to open communication and collaboration with...

Read more

Contact

for additional information on IMD publications

Related topics

Coaching

Strategy

Browse all topics

Silicon Valley is winning the race to build the first driverless cars (2024)

FAQs

Who is winning the self-driving car race? ›

The autonomous vehicle company's caution, once seen as a weakness, is starting to pay off. Others should heed that lesson as they develop AI at breakneck speed.

Who made the first self-driving car? ›

History of Autonomous Cars

In GM's 1939 exhibit, Norman Bel Geddes created the first self-driving car, which was an electric vehicle guided by radio-controlled electromagnetic fields generated with magnetized metal spikes embedded in the roadway. By 1958, General Motors had made this concept a reality.

Who is leading the self-driving car technology? ›

In March 2023, Mobileye was named the leader in autonomous vehicle technology by two industry reports – Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard: Automated Driving Systems and the first-ever ABI Research Autonomous Vehicle Platforms.

What problem did self-driving cars solve? ›

The advantages of autonomous driving are obvious: Increased road safety, reduced driver workload, lower fuel consumption and fewer traffic jams are just a few. Still to be overcome, however, are issues such as: technical challenges.

Who has won the most race car races? ›

Lewis Hamilton holds the record for the most race wins in Formula One history, with 103 wins to date. Michael Schumacher, the previous record holder, is second with 91 wins, and Max Verstappen is third with 61 victories. Kimi Räikkönen holds the distinction of having the longest time between his first win and his last.

Who is the number one race car driver? ›

Lewis Hamilton - 103 wins.

What cities have driverless cars? ›

Waymo, which provides driverless rides in Phoenix and San Francisco, said it would next roll out its services in Los Angeles and Austin. Zoox, another self-driving car company, said it planned to introduce robotaxis in San Francisco and Las Vegas but did not provide a time frame.

Which car has the best self-driving? ›

Verdict
Car and rankingEase of useHands-off
1. Tesla Model Y55
2. Audi RS Q855
3. BMW iX355
4. Nissan Qashqai45
6 more rows

Is Tesla a driverless car? ›

As Tesla's Autopilot and Full Self-Driving capabilities evolve, your vehicle will be continuously upgraded through over-the-air software updates.

Do we really need self-driving cars? ›

Fewer traffic jams save fuel and reduce greenhouse gases from needless idling. Automated driving systems may reduce unnecessary braking and acceleration that waste fuel. Vehicles with fully automated driving systems may be able to travel more closely together, reducing air drag and thereby reducing fuel use.

Can driverless cars be hacked? ›

Autonomous Vehicles Are Vulnerable to Lidar Hacking, Researchers Say. Researchers at the University of California Irvine say that relying on lidar for obstacle avoidance comes with risks.

Why should self-driving cars be illegal? ›

Conclusion Self-driving cars should be made illegal due to the frequent rates of accidents it causes and the financial ramifications of implementing the project. Utilitarianism is the best ethical framework that applies in this situation.

Who is closest to full self-driving? ›

Vehicles That Are Almost Self-Driving
  • 2024 Nissan Ariya: Price w/ Autonomous Driving Features: $47,690.
  • 2024 Infiniti QX50: Price w/ Autonomous Driving Features: $41,000.
  • 2024 Volkswagen ID.4: Price w/ Autonomous Driving Features: $39,735.
  • 2024 Hyundai Palisade: Price w/ Autonomous Driving Features: $36,650.

Who has the best self-driving technology? ›

Verdict
Car and rankingEase of useHands-off
1. Tesla Model Y55
2. Audi RS Q855
3. BMW iX355
4. Nissan Qashqai45
6 more rows

What company is leading in autonomous vehicles? ›

Tesla Inc.

Regarding automated vehicle technology, perhaps the most well-known company is Tesla. Tesla has made a name for itself with their various self-driving automobiles, with cars like the Model S and Model Y being some of the most prominent Tesla vehicles.

How much is Waymo worth? ›

After peaking at $175 billion in November of 2019, the valuation was cut to just $30 billion by March 2020, where it still stands today.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Delena Feil

Last Updated:

Views: 6579

Rating: 4.4 / 5 (65 voted)

Reviews: 80% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Delena Feil

Birthday: 1998-08-29

Address: 747 Lubowitz Run, Sidmouth, HI 90646-5543

Phone: +99513241752844

Job: Design Supervisor

Hobby: Digital arts, Lacemaking, Air sports, Running, Scouting, Shooting, Puzzles

Introduction: My name is Delena Feil, I am a clean, splendid, calm, fancy, jolly, bright, faithful person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.