Article
Professor Michael Wade in The Conversation
By Michael R. Wade and Remy Assir
6 min.
February 2018
Henry Ford didn’t invent the motor car. The late 1800s saw a flurry of innovation by hundreds of companies battling to deliver on the promise of fast, efficient and reasonably-priced mechanical transportation. Ford later came to dominate the industry thanks to the development of the moving assembly line.
Today the sector is poised for another breakthrough with the advent of cars that drive themselves. But unlike the original wave of automobile innovation, the race for supremacy in autonomous vehicles is concentrated among a few corporate giants. So who is set to dominate this time?
I’ve analysed six companies we think are leading the race to build the first truly driverless car. Three of these – General Motors, Ford and Volkswagen – come from the existing car industry and need to integrate self-driving technology into their existing fleet of mass-produced vehicles. The other three – Tesla, Uber and Waymo (owned by the same company as Google) – are newcomers from the digital technology world of Silicon Valley and have to build a mass manufacturing capability.
While it’s impossible to know all the developments at any given time, we have tracked investments, strategic partnerships and official press releases to learn more about what’s happening behind the scenes. The car industry typically rates self-driving technology on a scale from Level 0 (no automation) to Level 5 (full automation). We’ve assessed where each company is now and estimated how far they are from reaching the top level. Here’s how we think each player is performing.
Volkswagen
Volkswagen has invested in taxi-hailing app Gett and partnered with chip-maker Nvidia to develop an artificial intelligence co-pilot for its cars. In 2018, the VW Group is set to release the Audi A8, the first production vehicle that reaches Level 3 on the scale, “conditional driving automation”. This means the car’s computer will handle all driving functions but a human has to be ready to take over if necessary.
Ford
Ford already sells cars with a Level 2 autopilot, “partial driving automation”. This means one or more aspects of driving are controlled by a computer based on information about the environment, for example combined cruise control and lane centring. Alongside other investments, the company has put US$1 billion into Argo AI, an artificial intelligence company for self-driving vehicles. Following a trial to test pizza delivery using autonomous vehicles, Ford is now testing Level 4 cars on public roads. These feature “high automation”, where the car can drive entirely on its own but not in certain conditions such as when the road surface is poor or the weather is bad.
General Motors
GM also sells vehicles with Level 2 automation but, after buying Silicon Valley startup Cruise Automation in 2016, now plans to launch the first mass production-ready Level 5 autonomy vehicle that drives completely on its own by 2019. The Cruise AV will have no steering wheel or pedals to allow a human to take over and be part of a large fleet of driverless taxis the company plans to operate in big cities. But crucially the company hasn’t yet secured permission to test the car on public roads.
Waymo (Google)
Founded as a special project in 2009, Waymo separated from Google (though they’re both owned by the same parent firm, Alphabet) in 2016. Though it has never made, sold or operated a car on a commercial basis, Waymo has created test vehicles that have clocked more than 4m miles without human drivers as of November 2017. Waymo tested its Level 5 car, “Firefly”, between 2015 and 2017 but then decided to focus on hardware that could be installed in other manufacturers’ vehicles, starting with the Chrysler Pacifica.
Uber
The taxi-hailing app maker Uber has been testing autonomous cars on the streets of Pittsburgh since 2016, always with an employee behind the wheel ready to take over in case of a malfunction. After buying the self-driving truck company Otto in 2016 for a reported US$680m, Uber is now expanding its AI capabilities and plans to test NVDIA’s latest chips in Otto’s vehicles. It has also partnered with Volvo to create a self-driving fleet of cars, and with Toyota to co-create a ride-sharing autonomous vehicle.
Tesla
The first major car manufacturer to come from Silicon Valley, Tesla was also the first to introduce Level 2 autopilot back in 2015. The following year, it announced that all new Teslas would have the hardware for full autonomy, meaning once the software is finished it can be deployed on existing cars with an instant upgrade. Some experts have challenged this approach, arguing that the company has merely added surround cameras to its production cars that aren’t as capable as the laser-based sensing systems that most other carmakers are using.
But the company has collected data from hundreds of thousands of cars, driving millions of miles across all terrains. So we shouldn’t dismiss the firm’s founder, Elon Musk, when he claims a Level 4 Tesla will drive from LA to New York without any human interference within the first half of 2018.
Winners
At the moment, the disruptors like Tesla, Waymo and Uber seem to have the upper hand. While the traditional automakers are focusing on bringing Level 3 and 4 partial automation to market, the new companies are leapfrogging them by moving more directly towards Level 5 full automation. Waymo may have the least experience of dealing with consumers in this sector but it has already clocked up a huge amount of time testing some of the most advanced technology on public roads.
The incumbent carmakers are also focused on the difficult process of integrating new technology and business models into their existing manufacturing operations by buying up small companies. The challengers, on the other hand, are easily partnering with other big players including manufacturers to get the scale and expertise they need more quickly.
Tesla is building its own manufacturing capability but also collecting vast amounts of critical data that will enable it to more easily upgrade its cars when ready for full automation. In particular, Waymo’s experience, technology capability and ability to secure solid partnerships puts it at the head of the pack.
This article was published in The Conversation.
Contact
for additional information on IMD publications
Related topics
Strategy
Browse all topics
Digital and AI Transformation
Related topics
Strategy
Browse all topics
Discover our latest research
IMD's faculty and research teams publish articles, case studies, books and reports on a wide range of topics
All articles
Keep reading
Case Study
How Boeing lost altitude
The case study examines recent aviation safety concerns at Boeing, focusing on manufacturing issues, leadership decisions and regulatory oversight....
Board Corporate Governance Leadership Strategy
By Goutam Challagalla, Patrick Reinmoeller and Samaja Penumaka
Case reference: IMD-7-2588, © 2024
Read more
Case Study
UrbanLuxe Cosmetics: Embracing S&OP/IBP
The case is seen through the eyes of the newly appointed supply chain director at a cosmetics company based in Berlin. The general manager has task...
Operations Strategy
By Ralf W. Seifert and Richard Markoff
Case reference: IMD-7-2572, © 2024
Read more
Case Study
Metalshub: A steely approach to launching a B2B metal trading platform
Few Business to Business (B2B) marketplaces have succeeded. Metalshub has successfully combined a software platform as a service, with a marketplac...
Business to Business Digital Disruption Economics Operations Strategy
By Didier Bonnet, Geoffrey G. Parker, Charles E. Hutchinson and Lisa Simone Duke
Case reference: IMD-7-2457, © 2024
Read more
Case Study
Contabilizei: Freeing entrepreneurs from Brazil’s tax complexity
The case focuses on Contabilizei, a Brazilian startup providing online accounting services for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The case ...
Entrepreneurship Business to Business Digital Strategy
By Benoit F. Leleux, Diego Dias, Ariella Pfenninger, Daniel Töller and Thomas Villiger
Case reference: IMD-7-2546, © 2024
Read more
Article
Engineer your own luck
Companies that modularize and externalize their best capabilities are in a strong position to seize unexpected opportunities. Prediction is hard. T...
Organizational Change Disruption Strategy Innovation
By Mark J. Greeven, Howard H. Yu and Jialu Shan
in MIT Sloan Management Review
Summer 2024, vol. 65, no. 4
Read more
Article
Why Chinese companies are betting big on the Euro 24 tournament
Leading Chinese companies are preparing to take advantage of exposure and opportunities as top sponsors and suppliers to the UEFA EURO 2024 Men’s S...
Competitiveness Innovation Strategy China Future Readiness Marketing
By Mark J. Greeven and Howard H. Yu
in I by IMD
5 June 2024
Read more
Article
Election smoke and mirrors: Assessing Biden's recent tariff moves against China
Now that the dust has settled, what should executives make of President Biden's recent restrictions on certain goods sources from China?
Competitiveness Leadership Strategy China
By Simon J. Evenett
in I by IMD
4 June 2024
Read more
How Boeing lost altitude
By Goutam ChallagallaPatrick ReinmoellerandSamaja Penumaka
Case reference:IMD-7-2588©2024
Summary
The case study examines recent aviation safety concerns at Boeing, focusing on manufacturing issues, leadership decisions and regulatory oversight. It traces Boeing’s trajectory since the McDonnell Douglas merger in 1997, highlighting the changes in the engineering culture and outsourcing strategy that affected the production quality of the 787 Dreamliner and the 737 MAX aircraft. The case also explores how leadership decisions prioritized cost-cutting over quality, leading to inconsistencies and delays. Then the case discusses the 737 MAX, which was grounded after two major crashes in 2018 and 2019. Investigations by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the Department of Justice and a Senate Committee found defects in the MCAS flight control system and flaws in the safety certification. The case study explores the leadership actions of CEOs McNerney, Muilenburg and Calhoun, who decisively shaped the nature of the company.
Reference IMD-7-2588
Copyright ©2024
Copyright owner IMD Copyright
Organization Boeing
Industry Travel and Leisure, Airlines and Aviation
Available Languages English
Contact
for additional information on IMD publications
Related topics
Board
Corporate Governance
Leadership
Strategy
Browse all topics
Ringing the changes: Vodafone ‘insider' makes some tough calls as CEO [Video]
By Jean-François Manzoni
inI by IMD18 June 2024
Summary
Margherita Della Valle tells IMD President Jean-François Manzoni how she is delivering radical change to reenergize Vodafone and paving the way for...
Read more
Contact
for additional information on IMD publications
Related topics
UrbanLuxe Cosmetics: Embracing S&OP/IBP
By Ralf W. SeifertandRichard Markoff
Case reference:IMD-7-2572©2024
Summary
The case is seen through the eyes of the newly appointed supply chain director at a cosmetics company based in Berlin. The general manager has tasked the new supply chain director to provide bold process recommendations to improve the poor service, high inventory and rampant use of overtime. To understand the issues at play, the supply chain director meets with the CFO, the factory manager, the chief procurement officer and chief revenue officer and their feedback constitutes the body of the case. Each individual offers a different perspective, though none take any responsibility. The CFO is unhappy with the high inventory levels. The factory manager feels helpless in the situation. The chief procurement officer is proud of the savings he has generated by shifting to Asia. The chief revenue officer appears altogether disinterested and not concerned by the problem. The supply chain director must integrate this feedback and propose a new process that will address the performance shortcomings, define the roles and responsibilities of each, along with KPIs to monitor progress.
Reference IMD-7-2572
Copyright ©2024
Copyright owner IMD Copyright
Organization UrbanLuxe Cosmetics (Invented name)
Available Languages English
Contact
for additional information on IMD publications
Related topics
Operations
Strategy
Browse all topics
Metalshub: A steely approach to launching a B2B metal trading platform
By Didier BonnetGeoffrey G. ParkerCharles E. HutchinsonandLisa Simone Duke
Case reference:IMD-7-2457©2024
Summary
Few Business to Business (B2B) marketplaces have succeeded. Metalshub has successfully combined a software platform as a service, with a marketplace matching supply and demand for raw materials used in the Metals and Mining industries. Through innovative pricing and business models, the company has managed to scale its operations in a short timeframe.
Reference IMD-7-2457
Copyright ©2024
Copyright owner IMD Copyright
Organization Metalshub
Industry Materials, Metals and Mining
Available Languages English
Contact
for additional information on IMD publications
Related topics
Business to Business
Digital
Disruption
Economics
Operations
Strategy
Browse all topics
Contabilizei: Freeing entrepreneurs from Brazil’s tax complexity
By Benoit F. LeleuxDiego DiasAriella PfenningerDaniel TöllerandThomas Villiger
Case reference:IMD-7-2546©2024
Summary
The case focuses on Contabilizei, a Brazilian startup providing online accounting services for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The case study delves into the challenges faced by the company’s founder and CEO, Vitor Torres, as he navigated Brazil’s complex social and economic landscape. Issues such as Brazil’s byzantine tax system, disparate educational quality and accessibility, and the high cost of doing business in the country are explored. Despite these barriers, Contabilizei demonstrated impressive growth, transforming digital innovation into standardized services. However, the rise of competitors and persistent profitability concerns prompt Torres to thoroughly explore future strategies to maintain market leadership and improve financial performance. The case provides an in-depth analysis of Brazil’s entrepreneurial ecosystem, examining its business, educational, legal and infrastructural realities and their implications for startups as well as the difficult step for startups to become established companies.
Reference IMD-7-2546
Copyright ©2024
Copyright owner IMD Copyright
Organization Contabilizei
Industry Finance and Insurance, Financial Services
Available Languages English
Contact
for additional information on IMD publications
Related topics
Entrepreneurship
Business to Business
Digital
Strategy
Browse all topics
Ipsen: Leveraging an encompassing strategy to accelerate growth in pharma
By Niccolò Pisani
inI by IMD11 June 2024
Summary
IMD's Niccolò Pisani examines how a combination of clear-eyed analysis and a strong sense of purpose allowed the French biopharma to change course.
Read more
Contact
for additional information on IMD publications
Related topics
Leadership
Strategy
Decision Making
Browse all topics
Engineer your own luck
By Mark J. GreevenHoward H. YuandJialu Shan
inMIT Sloan Management ReviewSummer 2024, vol. 65, no. 4
Summary
Companies that modularize and externalize their best capabilities are in a strong position to seize unexpected opportunities. Prediction is hard. T...
Contact
for additional information on IMD publications
Related topics
Organizational Change
Disruption
Strategy
Innovation
Browse all topics
Why Chinese companies are betting big on the Euro 24 tournament
By Mark J. GreevenandHoward H. Yu
inI by IMD5 June 2024
Summary
Leading Chinese companies are preparing to take advantage of exposure and opportunities as top sponsors and suppliers to the UEFA EURO 2024 Men’s S...
Contact
for additional information on IMD publications
Related topics
Competitiveness
Innovation
Strategy
China
Future Readiness
Marketing
Browse all topics
Election smoke and mirrors: Assessing Biden's recent tariff moves against China
By Simon J. Evenett
inI by IMD4 June 2024
Summary
Now that the dust has settled, what should executives make of President Biden's recent restrictions on certain goods sources from China?
Contact
for additional information on IMD publications
Related topics
Competitiveness
Leadership
Strategy
China
Browse all topics
How to accelerate strategic capabilities
By Ioana Parry
inI by IMD24 May 2024
Summary
Andie, an operations director, overcomes team silos and funding uncertainties by shifting from control to open communication and collaboration with...
Read more
Contact
for additional information on IMD publications
Related topics
Coaching
Strategy
Browse all topics