More Reasons States Should Not Legalize Marijuana: Medical and Recreational Marijuana: Commentary and Review of the Literature (2024)

Mo Med. 2013 Nov-Dec; 110(6): 524–528.

PMCID: PMC6179811

PMID: 24564006

Author information Copyright and License information PMC Disclaimer

Abstract

Recent years have seen substantial shifts in cultural attitudes towards marijuana for medical and recreational use. Potential problems with the approval, production, dispensation, route of administration, and negative health effects of medical and recreational marijuana are reviewed. Medical marijuana should be subject to the same rigorous approval process as other medications prescribed by physicians. Legalizing recreational marijuana may have negative public health effects.

Introduction

Recent years have seen a cultural shift in attitudes towards marijuana. At the time of this writing, medical marijuana is legal in 20 states and the District of Columbia; recreational marijuana is now legal in Washington and Colorado. A substantial and growing literature documents legalized marijuana may have adverse effects on individual and public health.

Medical Use of Marijuana

The term ‘medical marijuana’ implies that marijuana is like any other medication prescribed by a physician. Yet the ways in which medical marijuana has been approved, prescribed, and made available to the public are very different from other commercially available prescription drugs. These differences pose problems unrecognized by the public and by many physicians.

Lack of Evidence for Therapeutic Benefit

In the United States, commercially available drugs are subject to rigorous clinical trials to evaluate safety and efficacy. Data appraising the effectiveness of marijuana in conditions such as HIV/AIDS, epilepsy, and chemotherapy-associated vomiting is limited and often only anecdotal.1,2 To date, there has been only one randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of smoked marijuana for any of its potential indications, which showed that marijuana was superior to placebo but inferior to Ondansetron in treating nausea.3 Recent reviews by the Cochrane Collaboration find insufficient evidence to support the use of smoked marijuana for a number of potential indications, including pain related to rheumatoid arthritis,4 dementia,5 ataxia or tremor in multiple sclerosis,6 and cachexia and other symptoms in HIV/AIDS.2 This does not mean, of course, that components of marijuana do not have potential therapeutic effects to alleviate onerous symptoms of these diseases; but, given the unfavorable side effect profile of marijuana, the evidence to justify use in these conditions is still lacking.

Contamination, Concentration & Route of Administration

Unlike any other prescription drug used for medical purposes, marijuana is not subject to central regulatory oversight. It is grown in dispensaries, which, depending on the state, have regulatory standards ranging from strict to almost non-existent. The crude marijuana plant and its products may be contaminated with fungus or mold.7 This is especially problematic for immunocompromised patients,8 including those with HIV/AIDS or cancer.9 Furthermore, crude marijuana contains over 60 active cannabinoids,10 few of which are well studied. Marijuana growers often breed their plants to alter the concentrations of different chemicals compounds. For instance, the concentration of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the principal psychoactive ingredient, is more than 20-fold more than in marijuana products used several decades ago. Without rigorous clinical trials, we have no way of knowing which combinations of cannabinoids may be therapeutic and which may be deleterious. As marijuana dispensaries experiment by breeding out different cannabinoids in order to increase the potency of THC, there may be unanticipated negative and lasting effects for individuals who smoke these strains.

Marijuana is the only ‘medication’ that is smoked, and, while still incompletely understood, there are legitimate concerns about long-term effects of marijuana smoke on the lungs.11,12 Compared with cigarette smoke, marijuana smoke can result in three times the amount of inhaled tar and four times the amount of inhaled carbon-monoxide.13 Further, smoking marijuana has been shown to be a risk factor for lung cancer in many14,15 but not all16 studies.

High Potential for Diversion

In some states, patients are permitted to grow their own marijuana. In addition to contributing to problems such as contamination and concentration as discussed above, this practice also invites drug diversion. Patients seeking to benefit financially may bypass local regulations of production and sell home-grown marijuana at prices lower than dispensaries. We do not allow patient to grow their own opium for treatment of chronic pain; the derivatives of opium, like marijuana, are highly addictive and thus stringently regulated.

Widespread “Off-label” Use

FDA-approved forms of THC (Dronabinol) and a THC-analog (Nabilone), both available orally, already exist. Indications for these drugs are HIV/AIDS cachexia and chemotherapy-associated nausea and vomiting. Unlike smoked, crude marijuana, these medications have been subject to randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trials. Yet despite these limited indications where marijuana compounds have a proven but modest effect in high-quality clinical trials, medical marijuana is used overwhelmingly for non-specific pain or muscle spasms. Recent data from Colorado show that 94% of patients with medical marijuana cards received them for treatment of “severe pain.”17 Similar trends are evident in California.18 Evidence for the benefit of marijuana in neuropathic pain is seen in many19-21 but not all22 clinical trials. There is no high-quality evidence, however, that the drug reduces non-neuropathic pain; this remains an indication for which data sufficient to justify the risks of medical marijuana is lacking.4, 2325

If marijuana is to be ‘prescribed’ by physicians and used as a medication, it should be subject to the same rigorous approval process that other commercially available drugs undergo. Potentially therapeutic components of marijuana should be investigated, but they should only be made available to the public after adequately powered, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials have demonstrated efficacy and acceptable safety profiles. Furthermore, these compounds should be administered in a way that poses less risk than smoking and dispensed via standardized and FDA-regulated pharmacies to ensure purity and concentration. Bypassing the FDA and approving ‘medicine’ at the ballot box sets a dangerous precedent. Physicians should be discouraged from recommending medical marijuana. Alternatively, consideration can be given to prescribing FDA-approved medicines (Dronabinol or Cesamet) as the purity and concentration of these drugs are assured and their efficacy and side effect profiles have been well documented in rigorous clinical trials.

Recreational Marijuana

The question of recreational marijuana is a broader social policy consideration involving implications of the effects of legalization on international drug cartels, domestic criminal justice policy, and federal and state tax revenue in addition to public health. Yet physicians, with a responsibility for public health, are experts with a vested interest in this issue. Recent legislation, reflecting changes in the public’s attitudes towards marijuana, has permitted the recreational use of marijuana in Colorado and Washington. Unfortunately, the negative health consequences of the drug are not prominent in the debate over legalizing marijuana for recreational use. In many cases, these negative effects are more pronounced in adolescents. A compelling argument, based on these negative health effects in both adolescents and adults, can be made to abort the direction society is moving with regards to the legalization of recreational marijuana.

Myth: Marijuana is Not Addictive

A growing myth among the public is that marijuana is not an addictive substance. Data clearly show that about 10% of those who use cannabis become addicted; this number is higher among adolescents.26 Users who seek treatment for marijuana addiction average 10 years of daily use.27 A withdrawal syndrome has been described, consisting of anxiety, restlessness, insomnia, depression, and changes in appetite28 and affects as many as 44% of frequent users,29 contributing to the addictive potential of the drug. This addictive potential may be less than that of opiates; but the belief, especially among adolescents, that the drug is not addictive is misguided.

Schizophrenia and Other Psychotic Disorders

Marijuana has been consistently shown to be a risk factor for schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders.3032 The association between marijuana and schizophrenia fulfills many, but not all, of the standard criteria for the epidemiological establishment of causation, including experimental evidence,33,34 temporal relationship,3538 biological gradient,30,31,39 and biological plausibility.40 Genetic variation may explain why marijuana use does not strongly fulfill remaining criteria, such as strength of association and specificity.41,42 As these genetic variants are explored and further characterized, marijuana use may be shown to cause or precipitate schizophrenia in a genetically vulnerable population. The risk of psychotic disorder is more pronounced when marijuana is used at an earlier age.32, 43

More Reasons States Should Not Legalize Marijuana: Medical and Recreational Marijuana: Commentary and Review of the Literature (2)

There is some evidence that compounds naturally found in marijuana have therapeutic benefit for symptoms of diseases such as HIV/AIDS, multiple sclerosis, and cancer. If these compounds are to be used under the auspices of ‘medical marijuana,’ they should undergo the same rigorous approval process that other medications prescribed by physicians, including randomized, placebo- and active-controlled trials to evaluate safety and efficacy, not by popular vote or state legislature.

Effects on Cognition

Early studies suggested cognitive declines associated with marijuana (especially early and heavy use); these declines persisted long after the period of acute cannabis intoxication.4446 Recently, Meier and colleagues analyzed data from a prospective study which followed subjects from birth to age 38; their findings yielded supportive evidence that cannabis use, when begun during adolescence, was associated with cognitive impairment in multiple areas, including executive functioning, processing speed, memory, perceptual reasoning, and verbal comprehension.47 Rogeberg48 criticized the study’s methodology, claiming that the results were confounded by differences in socioeconomic status; this claim, however, was based on sub-analyses that used very small numbers. Additional sub-analyses49 of the original study cohort showed that marijuana was just as prevalent in populations of higher socioeconomic status, suggesting that socioeconomic status was not a confounding variable. Any epidemiological study is subject to confounding biases and future research will be needed to clarify and quantify the relationship between cognitive decline and adolescent marijuana use. However, the findings of the original study by Meier et al show there is indeed an independent relationship between loss of intelligence and adolescent marijuana use. This finding, moreover, is consistent with prior studies.44

Other Negative Health Effects

Substantial evidence exists suggesting that marijuana is harmful to the respiratory system. It is associated with symptoms of obstructive and inflammatory lung disease,11,50 an increased risk of lung cancer,14,15 and it is suspected to be associated with reduced pulmonary function in heavy users.51 Further, its use has been associated with harmful effects to other organ systems, including the reproductive,52 gastrointestinal,53 and immunologic10, 54 systems.

Social Safety Implications: Effects on Driving

Marijuana impairs the ability to judge time, distance, and speed; it slows reaction time and reduces ability to track moving objects.55,56 In many studies of drug-related motor vehicle fatalities, marijuana is the most common drug detected except for alcohol.57,58 Based on post-mortem studies, Couch et al determined that marijuana was likely an impairing factor in as many fatal accidents as alcohol.59 One study showed that in motor vehicle accidents where the driver was killed, recent marijuana use was detected in 12% of cases.57 Other research confirms a significantly increased risk of motor vehicle fatalities in association with acute cannabis intoxication.60

Risk Perception and Use in Adolescents

Marijuana use among adolescents has been increasing. Data that has tracked risk perception and use of marijuana among adolescents over decades clearly shows an inverse relationship; as adolescent risk perception wanes, marijuana use increases.61 As more states legalize medical and recreational marijuana, risk perception is expected to decrease, causing the prevalence of use among adolescent to continue to rise. This is among the most concerning of issues about the drug’s legalization because so many of the negative effects of marijuana—including cognitive impairment and risk for short- and long-term psychosis— are heightened when used during adolescence.

Conclusion

There is some evidence that compounds naturally found in marijuana have therapeutic benefit for symptoms of diseases such as HIV/AIDS, multiple sclerosis, and cancer. If these compounds are to be used under the auspices of ‘medical marijuana,’ they should undergo the same rigorous approval process that other medications prescribed by physicians, including randomized, placebo- and active-controlled trials to evaluate safety and efficacy, not by popular vote or state legislature. Furthermore, these therapeutic compounds should be administered via a route that minimizes long-term health risk (i.e., via oral pill) and should be dispensed by centrally regulated pharmacies to ensure the purity and concentration of the drug and allow for the recall of contaminated batches.

Marijuana for recreational use will have many adverse health effects. The drug is addictive, with mounting evidence for the existence of a withdrawal syndrome. Furthermore, it has been shown to have adverse effects on mental health, intelligence (including irreversible declines in cognition), and the respiratory system. Driving while acutely intoxicated with marijuana greatly increases the risk of fatal motor vehicle collision. Legalization for recreational use may have theoretical (but still unproven) beneficial social effects regarding issues such as domestic criminal justice policy, but these effects will not come without substantial public health and social costs. Currently there is a lack of resources devoted to educating physicians about this most commonly used illicit substance. The potential benefits and significant risks associated with marijuana use should be taught in medical schools and residency programs throughout the country.

Biography

Samuel T. Wilkinson, MD, is in the Department of Psychiatry at the Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Ct.

Contact: ude.elay@nosnikliw.leumaS

Footnotes

Disclosure

None reported.

References

1. Gloss D, Vickrey B. Cannabinoids for epilepsy. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2012:13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

2. Lutge EE, Gray A, Siegfried N. The medical use of cannabis for reducing morbidity and mortality in patients with HIV/AIDS. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2013;4:CD005175. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

3. Soderpalm AH, Schuster A, de Wit H. Antiemetic efficacy of smoked marijuana: subjective and behavioral effects on nausea induced by syrup of ipecac. Pharmacology, biochemistry and behavior. 2001;69:343–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

4. Richards BL, Whittle SL, Buchbinder R. Neuromodulators for pain management in rheumatoid arthritis. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2012;1:CD008921. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

5. Krishnan S, Cairns R, Howard R. Cannabinoids for the treatment of dementia. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2009:CD007204. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

6. Mills RJ, Yap L, Young CA. Treatment for ataxia in multiple sclerosis. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2007:CD005029. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

7. Verweij PE, Kerremans JJ, Voss A, Meis JF. Fungal contamination of tobacco and marijuana. JAMA. 2000 Dec 13;284(22):2875. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

8. Gongidi P, Sarkar D, Behling E, Brody J. Cerebral phaeohyphomycosis in a patient with neurosarcoidosis on chronic steroid therapy secondary to recreational marijuana usage. Case Rep Radiol. 2013;191375:21. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

9. Cescon DW, Page AV, Richardson S, Moore MJ, Boerner S, Gold WL. Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis associated with marijuana use in a man with colorectal cancer. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2008;26:2214–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

10. Svrakic DM, Lustman PJ, Mallya A, Lynn TA, Finney R, Svrakic NM. Legalization, decriminalization & medicinal use of cannabis: a scientific and public health perspective. Missouri Medicine. 2012;109:90–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

11. Tetrault JM, Crothers K, Moore BA, Mehra R, Concato J, Fiellin DA. Effects of marijuana smoking on pulmonary function and respiratory complications: a systematic review. Archives of internal medicine. 2007;167:221–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

12. Watson SJ, Benson JA, Jr, Joy JE. Marijuana and medicine: assessing the science base: a summary of the 1999 Institute of Medicine report. Archives of general psychiatry. 2000;57:547–52. [Google Scholar]

13. Wu TC, Tashkin DP, Djahed B, Rose JE. Pulmonary hazards of smoking marijuana as compared with tobacco. The New England journal of medicine. 1988;318:347–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

14. Sasco AJ, Merrill RM, Dari I, et al. A case-control study of lung cancer in Casablanca, Morocco. Cancer causes & control : CCC. 2002;13:609–16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

15. Aldington S, Harwood M, Cox B, et al. Cannabis use and risk of lung cancer: a case-control study. The European respiratory journal. 2008;31:280–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

16. Hashibe M, Morgenstern H, Cui Y, et al. Marijuana use and the risk of lung and upper aerodigestive tract cancers: results of a population-based case-control study. Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology. 2006;15:1829–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

17. Nussbaum AM, Boyer JA, Kondrad EC. “But my doctor recommended pot”: medical marijuana and the patient-physician relationship. Journal of general internal medicine. 2011;26:1364–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

18. Nunberg H, Kilmer B, Pacula RL, Burgdorf J. An Analysis of Applicants Presenting to a Medical Marijuana Specialty Practice in California. Journal of drug policy analysis. 2011:4. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

19. Ellis RJ, Toperoff W, Vaida F, et al. Smoked medicinal cannabis for neuropathic pain in HIV: a randomized, crossover clinical trial. Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology. 2009;34:672–80. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

20. Abrams DI, Jay CA, Shade SB, et al. Cannabis in painful HIV-associated sensory neuropathy: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Neurology. 2007;68:515–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

21. Wilsey B, Marcotte T, Tsodikov A, et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial of cannabis cigarettes in neuropathic pain. J Pain. 2008;9:506–21. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

22. Selvarajah D, Gandhi R, Emery CJ, Tesfaye S. Randomized placebo-controlled double-blind clinical trial of cannabis-based medicinal product (Sativex) in painful diabetic neuropathy: depression is a major confounding factor. Diabetes care. 2010;33:128–30. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

23. Leroux E, Taifas I, Valade D, Donnet A, Chagnon M, Ducros A. Use of cannabis among 139 cluster headache sufferers. Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache. 2013;33:208–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

24. Kraft B, Frickey NA, Kaufmann RM, et al. Lack of analgesia by oral standardized cannabis extract on acute inflammatory pain and hyperalgesia in volunteers. Anesthesiology. 2008;109:101–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

25. Buggy DJ, Toogood L, Maric S, Sharpe P, Lambert DG, Rowbotham DJ. Lack of analgesic efficacy of oral delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in postoperative pain. Pain. 2003;106:169–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

26. Kandel D, Chen K, Warner LA, Kessler RC, Grant B. Prevalence and demographic correlates of symptoms of last year dependence on alcohol, nicotine, marijuana and cocaine in the US population. Drug and alcohol dependence. 1997;44:11–29. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

27. Maldonado R, Berrendero F, Ozaita A, Robledo P. Neurochemical basis of cannabis addiction. Neuroscience. 2011;181:1–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

28. Budney AJ, Hughes JR. The cannabis withdrawal syndrome. Current opinion in psychiatry. 2006;19:233–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

29. Hasin DS, Keyes KM, Alderson D, Wang S, Aharonovich E, Grant BF. Cannabis withdrawal in the United States: results from NESARC. The Journal of clinical psychiatry. 2008;69:1354–63. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

30. Moore TH, Zammit S, Lingford-Hughes A, et al. Cannabis use and risk of psychotic or affective mental health outcomes: a systematic review. Lancet. 2007;370:319–28. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

31. Manrique-Garcia E, Zammit S, Dalman C, Hemmingsson T, Andreasson S, Allebeck P. Cannabis, schizophrenia and other non-affective psychoses: 35 years of follow-up of a population-based cohort. Psychological medicine. 2012;42:1321–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

32. Arseneault L, Cannon M, Witton J, Murray RM. Causal association between cannabis and psychosis: examination of the evidence. The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science. 2004;184:110–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

33. D’Souza DC, Fridberg DJ, Skosnik PD, et al. Dose-related modulation of event-related potentials to novel and target stimuli by intravenous Delta(9)-THC in humans. Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012;37:1632–46. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

34. D’Souza DC, Perry E, MacDougall L, et al. The psychotomimetic effects of intravenous delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in healthy individuals: implications for psychosis. Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology. 2004;29:1558–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

35. Linszen DH, Dingemans PM, Lenior ME. Cannabis abuse and the course of recent-onset schizophrenic disorders. Archives of general psychiatry. 1994;51:273–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

36. Dragt S, Nieman DH, Schultze-Lutter F, et al. Cannabis use and age at onset of symptoms in subjects at clinical high risk for psychosis. Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica. 2012;125:45–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

37. Cunha PJ, Rosa PG, Ayres Ade M, et al. Cannabis use, cognition and brain structure in first-episode psychosis. Schizophrenia research. 2013;147:209–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

38. Schimmelmann BG, Conus P, Cotton SM, et al. Cannabis use disorder and age at onset of psychosis--a study in first-episode patients. Schizophrenia research. 2011;129:52–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

39. Henquet C, Krabbendam L, Spauwen J, et al. Prospective cohort study of cannabis use, predisposition for psychosis, and psychotic symptoms in young people. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 2005;330:11. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

40. D’Souza DC, Sewell RA, Ranganathan M. Cannabis and psychosis/schizophrenia: human studies. European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience. 2009;259:413–31. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

41. Di Forti M, Iyegbe C, Sallis H, et al. Confirmation that the AKT1 (rs2494732) genotype influences the risk of psychosis in cannabis us. Biol Psychiatry. 2012;72:811–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

42. van Winkel R. Family-based analysis of genetic variation underlying psychosis-inducing effects of cannabis: sibling analysis and proband follow-up. Archives of general psychiatry. 2011;68:148–57. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

43. Trezza V, Cuomo V, Vanderschuren LJ. Cannabis and the developing brain: insights from behavior. European journal of pharmacology. 2008;585:441–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

44. Solowij N, Stephens RS, Roffman RA, et al. Cognitive functioning of long-term heavy cannabis users seeking treatment. JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association. 2002;287:1123–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

45. Pope HG, Jr, Yurgelun-Todd D. The residual cognitive effects of heavy marijuana use in college students. JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association. 1996;275:521–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

46. Fletcher JM, Page JB, Francis DJ, et al. Cognitive correlates of long-term cannabis use in Costa Rican men. Archives of general psychiatry. 1996;53:1051–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

47. Meier MH, Caspi A, Ambler A, et al. Persistent cannabis users show neuropsychological decline from childhood to midlife. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2012;109:E2657–64. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

48. Rogeberg O. Correlations between cannabis use and IQ change in the Dunedin cohort are consistent with confounding from socioeconomic status. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2013;110:4251–4. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

49. Moffitt TE, Meier MH, Caspi A, Poulton R. Reply to Rogeberg and Daly: No evidence that socioeconomic status or personality differences confound the association between cannabis use and IQ decline. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2013;110:E980–2. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

50. Moore BA, Augustson EM, Moser RP, Budney AJ. Respiratory effects of marijuana and tobacco use in a U.S. sample. Journal of general internal medicine. 2005;20:33–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

51. Pletcher MJ, Vittinghoff E, Kalhan R, et al. Association between marijuana exposure and pulmonary function over 20 years. JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association. 2012;307:173–81. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

52. Kolodny RC, Masters WH, Kolodner RM, Toro G. Depression of plasma testosterone levels after chronic intensive marihuana use. The New England journal of medicine. 1974;290:872–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

53. Sullivan S. Cannabinoid hyperemesis. Canadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie. 2010;24:284–5. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

54. Friedman H, Newton C, Klein TW. Microbial infections, immunomodulation, and drugs of abuse. Clinical microbiology reviews. 2003;16:209–19. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

55. Heyman RB, Anglin TM, Copperman SM, et al. American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Substance Abuse. Marijuana: A continuing concern for pediatricians. Pediatrics. 1999;104:982–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

56. Kurzthaler I, Hummer M, Miller C, et al. Effect of cannabis use on cognitive functions and driving ability. The Journal of clinical psychiatry. 1999;60:395–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

57. Schwilke EW, Sampaio dos Santos MI, Logan BK. Changing patterns of drug and alcohol use in fatally injured drivers in Washington State. J Forensic Sci. 2006;51:1191–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

58. Logan BK, Schwilke EW. Drug and alcohol use in fatally injured drivers in Washington State. J Forensic Sci. 1996;41:505–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

59. Crouch DJ, Birky MM, Gust SW, et al. The prevalence of drugs and alcohol in fatally injured truck drivers. J Forensic Sci. 1993;38:1342–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

60. Asbridge M, Hayden JA, Cartwright JL. Acute cannabis consumption and motor vehicle collision risk: systematic review of observational studies and meta-analysis. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 2012;344:e536. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

61. Kleber HD, DuPont RL. Physicians and medical marijuana. Am J Psychiatry. 2012;169:564–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

More Reasons States Should Not Legalize Marijuana: Medical and Recreational Marijuana: Commentary and Review of the Literature (2024)

FAQs

Why should medical marijuana not be legalized? ›

The drug is addictive, with mounting evidence for the existence of a withdrawal syndrome. Furthermore, it has been shown to have adverse effects on mental health, intelligence (including irreversible declines in cognition), and the respiratory system.

What are the negatives of legalizing marijuana in the United States? ›

The Cons of Legalizing Marijuana

Memory issues: Frequent marijuana use may seriously affect your short-term memory. 11. Cognition problems: Frequent use can impair your cognitive (thinking) abilities. Lung damage: Smoking anything, whether it's tobacco or marijuana, can damage your lung tissue.

What are 3 arguments why marijuana should be legal? ›

Three popular arguments in favor of legalizing adult cannabis use are: that its adverse health effects are modest compared with those of other licit and illicit drugs; that criminal penalties for cannabis use harm users and the community; and that legalization enables cannabis to be better regulated and taxed.

Is marijuana legal throughout the United States for medicinal reasons? ›

U.S. federal law doesn't allow the use of marijuana. But many states allow medical use to treat pain, nausea and other symptoms.

Why is medical marijuana bad? ›

Medical marijuana can cause harm. The most serious harms include an increased risk of car crashes in intoxicated users and the risk that children might accidentally ingest these products and have breathing problems and other overdose symptoms.

What are the effects of medical marijuana legalization? ›

There is evidence that ready access to legal cannabis is associated with a number of health harms including increased need for emergency medicine, and increased incidence of cannabis use disorder and road traffic accidents.

What are common concerns in the debate for legalizing medical marijuana? ›

Concerns About Marijuana Use

While most Americans support legalizing marijuana, there are concerns about public use of the drug, if it were to become legal. Overall, 62% say that if marijuana were legal it would bother them if people used it in public; just 33% say this would not bother them.

Why should states legalize marijuana? ›

One motivation for legalization is the economic boon that can come from the regulated commercial availability. Increased tax revenues, job growth, and investment opportunities all are powerful incentives to push for legalization. 24 states, three territories, and the District of Columbia allow for recreational use.

What are the arguments for the decriminalization of marijuana? ›

It is less toxic, less harmful to the body, less addictive, and less likely to contribute to violent or reckless behavior. Adults should not be punished for making the safer choice to use cannabis instead of alcohol, if that is what they prefer.

What are the pros and cons of medical marijuana? ›

Conclusion: Cannabis use diminishes some of the adverse effects of neurological and psychiatric disorders. However, chronic cannabis use may lead to cognitive impairments and dependence.

When and why was marijuana made illegal in the United States? ›

Aided by an eager news media—and such propaganda films as Reefer Madness (1936)—Anslinger eventually oversaw the passage of the Marihuana Tax Act in 1937, which effectively made the drug illegal across the United States.

Why is marijuana not FDA approved? ›

This means that the FDA has not found any such product to be safe or effective for the treatment of any disease or condition. Study of marijuana in clinical trial settings is needed to assess the safety and effectiveness of marijuana for medical use.

Why is marijuana bad for the environment? ›

Removing forest, grasslands, or other existing habitats for cannabis cultivation can cause wide-ranging impacts on terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. These impacts include loss and fragmentation of sensitive habitat due to road construction, grading and burying of streams, increased sediment delivery, and erosion.

What are the benefits of why marijuana should be legalized? ›

Increased tax revenues, job growth, and investment opportunities all are powerful incentives to push for legalization. 24 states, three territories, and the District of Columbia allow for recreational use. 38 states, three territories, and the District of Columbia allow for medical use.

Why shouldn't marijuana be legalized in the Philippines brainly? ›

Answer. Answer: Marijuana can be really addictive and too much of it can lead to sickness or even death. If the use of marijuana will be legalize in the Philippines our country can be dangerous, as the use of marijuana can make you see imaginary things or do hectic things that can make you very aggressive.

What does decriminalization mean for marijuana? ›

Decriminalization of cannabis means it would remain illegal, but the legal system would not prosecute a person for possession under a specified amount. Instead, the penalties would range from no penalties at all, civil fines, drug education, or drug treatment. No state has legalized cannabis thus far.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Chrissy Homenick

Last Updated:

Views: 6015

Rating: 4.3 / 5 (74 voted)

Reviews: 89% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Chrissy Homenick

Birthday: 2001-10-22

Address: 611 Kuhn Oval, Feltonbury, NY 02783-3818

Phone: +96619177651654

Job: Mining Representative

Hobby: amateur radio, Sculling, Knife making, Gardening, Watching movies, Gunsmithing, Video gaming

Introduction: My name is Chrissy Homenick, I am a tender, funny, determined, tender, glorious, fancy, enthusiastic person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.